A Kick Ass Browser RenaissanceJuly 5th, 2009
Why are building browsers in vogue again?
Quite simply, a browser renaissance, started with WebKit, a small and flexible open source code base that used less memory and power, and kicked ass at rendering the Web.
WebKit is really helping folks easily create and extend browsers with its very flexible and understandable code base. It’s truly the Linux renaissance again, driving innovation, and place browsers where they were difficult or impossible to put before. And WebKit’s rivals didn’t sit still, they’re also kicking ass at an insane clip, and we, the users and developers, benefit.
Great hardware needs great software.
The browser is really your OS now – your apps live and run there, and you want them to run well. The browser experience matters again. That’s why Apple is here, making a great browser to sell with their hardware. Google, Nokia, HTC, Palm and many others are here for the same reason.
Closely related to this activity are pure browser vendors like Opera, selling a quality mobile web browser to hardware OEMs that don’t have the time to make their own. This is also Mozilla’s goal with Fennec.
A flashier World Wide Web.
- Flash: Adobe needs to protect its dominance on the desktop Web interactive media experience. Adobe also wants to duplicate Flash’s success in mobile.
- CSS Visual Effects: Apple is tired of Flash’s slow pace of innovation, performance and constant crashing on Mac OS X. Steve and Bertrand’s insurance policy. And why the hell not when you make stuff like Quartz, Core Animation, QuickTime X, and iPhones.
- Silverlight: Microsoft builds their own browser, why not their own Flash?
- HTML5 Video: Everyone doesn’t want all video to go through a Flash plugin. Plus, cool video reflections!
What your high tech company should think about.
If you make consumer hardware products, having a great browser will be a key strategic factor to having great applications, user experience, and long-term extensibility.
If you make consumer facing applications, browsers now offer the best user interface framework “toolkit”. There are only very few reasons to use or build a custom UI framework today, primarily availability and performance.
If you make pure web applications already, targeting these modern browsers now makes sense, the most desirable consumers now have these types of browsers, and the market share continues to climb.
If you are Google, I’d do this.
Distributing computation work to browsers is a new frontier. Imagine offloading your search indexing or database indexing to visiting users. Having compute clusters will lower the cost of building large scale distributed services in the near future. Today’s primary barrier for this is bandwidth consumption (distributed applications still have large amounts of I/O) but it will work today for certain applications.
Food for thought …
Thanks to Om Malik for the inspiration to write this post. The one question I wish I had a better answer for is: “Why does Apple have Safari on Windows?” I believe the answer may be something more than, “oh hell no, Google ain’t gonna release no WebKit browser on Windows before we do…” (rewind to June 2007) but what the actual answer is, we may not know for some time.
Updates: Corrected that TraceMonkey is the Mozilla JS engine, not Tamarin. Thanks Dirkjan!
July 6th, 2009 at 12:01 am
The JS engine in current iterations of Firefox is called TraceMonkey. Tamarin is something else entirely (it was supposed to be used as a JS engine at some point, but I think it wasn’t performant enough).
July 6th, 2009 at 6:56 pm
[…] satine.org » A Kick Ass Browser Renaissance […]
August 3rd, 2009 at 12:49 am
There may have been something more strategic in mind when Apple released Safari for Windows, but it could have just as simply been low hanging fruit in the kick-ass-software-as-Trojan-horse genre, à la iTunes. It’s a relatively simple way to put Apple technology in front of Winblows users. Maybe a little font anti-aliasing is all it takes for some to reconsider their operating system?!
August 3rd, 2009 at 5:30 am
On “Distributing computation work to browsers…”, is this the idea behind Opera Unite? (http://unite.opera.com/)
August 12th, 2009 at 7:16 pm
A better question would be, “Why WOULDN’T Apple release Safari for Windows?” If I had it my way, I’d have Safari on every computer in the world so that I could publish some of the nicest-looking, best-behaved websites. Maybe someone at Apple thought, “Well, if we release it for Windows, people might actually see that the web doesn’t have to be boring. We’re essentially raising the bar of expectations. And in the process it might help to overthrow IE dominance so that developers might one day not be so wedged.”
August 28th, 2010 at 4:43 pm
Yo love your blog, found it while randomly surving, will keep checking up. Bye…